Global warming science by consensus, with appeals to United Nations panels and other agencies as authorities… is the std septic mistake/disinformation. The *science* isn’t done that way; but (as you say) when formulating policy, of course you refer to the established body of work. How could it be otherwise?
Global warming science by consensus, with appeals to United Nations panels and other agencies as authorities… is the std septic mistake/disinformation. The *science* isn’t done that way; but (as you say) when formulating policy, of course you refer to the established body of work. How could it be otherwise?